The answer depends on the terms that were both of the framework agreement when it was originally awarded. Most agreements do not require the buyer or supplier to buy or deliver, that is, it facilitates the ordering and delivery process. Therefore, a supplier who receives a direct premium from a buyer is free to refuse that order. This may seem strange, but the supplier may be busy with other orders and no capacity at this time, or the conditions are no longer advantageous to them, etc. For TUPE to apply to service contracts, there must be a change in service delivery, which means that there must be an “organized group of workers” whose “primary purpose” is the performance of the activities involved, and the employees involved must be “attached” to the organized group of workers. So back to your original question. If you are wondering whether a particular board has the right to use the framework agreement, take a look at the initial contract notice published in the Official Journal (OJ L 347 of 31.12.2006, p. 1). We can help you find the right direction for you if you don`t have easy access to it (call us on 0800 270 0249, or email us at It may be easy and easy to challenge the fact that the Commission has the right to use the framework. I have published an appeal document of a framework agreement, but there are errors.

I asked a question about the amendments that can be tabled in order to put out those of the t-c. We want to remove a framework under its direct pricing option. The supplier we chose in the framework agreement has forwarded a number of proposed amendments to compensation and liability amounts. The clauses to be amended concern both us as buyers and the supplier of the framing (for example, paragraph 7 states that “the supplier frees the supplier from the framework and the buyer of any claim made by a person employed by the supplier by an action or omission of the supplier or a member of the supplier`s staff”). Before considering these proposed amendments, we must obtain the agreement of the framework provider for (1) the general change in the terms of appeal and (2) approval for the specific proposed amendments, as they relate to compensations that relate to the supplier of the framework and us as purchasers. Sorry, I misunderstood your initial question. You are quite right Regulation 72 is the relevant provision in this case, that is,. You can add works, services or supplies that must be made by the original contractor, that have become necessary and that were not included in the first acquisition, provided that the price does not increase by more than 50% of the original value.